To cut it short, the brief timeline includes these key facts: On February 1, Trump imposes a 25% tariff on Canadian imports, sparking chaos across industries. Then, just two days later, on February 3, he decides to pause the tariffs for 30 days. What’s this game? Let’s dive deeper.
Just three days after threatening to start a trade war, U.S. President Donald Trump agreed to pause tariffs on Canadian imports for at least 30 days, as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced earlier on his X account. While this temporary delay may offer a brief delay, it begs the question: “How long will workers on both sides of the border continue to suffer as pawns in these political games” asks David Chartrand, IAM Union Canada, General Vice-President.
The reality is, for many families, the consequences of trade disruptions are not just theoretical. They are deeply personal. Workers in both the U.S. and Canada, many of whom are already struggling to make ends meet, face uncertainty and anxiety every time tariffs are threatened or imposed. These decisions, made by politicians in negotiations over issues like fentanyl smuggling and border security, can lead to job losses, higher costs of goods, and economic instability. And it’s these workers, the backbone of industries across both nations, who pay the price.
While the 30-day pause might seem like a win, it is ultimately a temporary solution that does little to address the ongoing strain that families face. These workers have become pawns in a larger political game, caught between leaders making deals with little regard for the human cost. They didn’t ask for this instability. They didn’t sign up to have their livelihoods threatened as part of negotiations.
How long can workers and their families endure this uncertainty? Every time Trump threatens tariffs, it is the people who rely on cross-border trade for their jobs that are left in uncertainty. This temporary pause may offer a break for now, but what workers really need is long-term stability and assurance that they won’t continue to be treated as leverage in a game that doesn’t consider their daily struggles.
As this political and economical game plays out, it is essential that we ask: When will we stop using workers as bargaining chips? They deserve more than a quick fix. They deserve security and a future that isn’t at the mercy of trade tensions.
It’s time we demand more stability for those who depend on the trade that fuels their livelihoods.
